Relación entre la estación del año y la gravedad de los síntomas en pacientes con fibromialgia / Relationship between season of the year and severity of symptoms in patients with fibromyalgia

Antecedentes y objetivo: Es frecuente que los pacientes con fibromialgia refieran que ciertas estaciones del año agravan sus síntomas. Como objetivo primario se determinó la asociación entre síntomas claves de la fibromialgia y estación del año. Como objetivo secundario se determinó la existencia de diferencias en función de los niveles de ansiedad o depresión.Material y métodoMuestra de conveniencia formada por 471 participantes con fibromialgia evaluados antes de iniciar un tratamiento multidisciplinar. Se recogieron datos demográficos y meteorológicos y se evaluaron, mediante instrumentos estandarizados, la intensidad del dolor, la funcionalidad, la fatiga, la rigidez, la calidad del sueño, así como la ansiedad y la depresión.ResultadosLos diferentes grupos estacionales fueron homogéneos en edad, género, nivel educativo, estado marital y situación laboral. No se encontraron diferencias significativas en intensidad del dolor (F=1,334; p=0,265), funcionalidad (F=0,402; p=0,669), fatiga (F=0,714; p=0,490), rigidez (F=0,299; p=0,741), ansiedad (F=0,376; p=0,687), depresión (F=0,608; p=0,545), distrés psicológico (F=0,261; p=0,770), duración del sueño (F=1,507; p=0,223) o el índice de problemas de sueño (F=0,343; p=0,710).ConclusionesNo se han encontrado diferencias en la intensidad de los síntomas de la fibromialgia ni en los porcentajes de gravedad entre las distintas estaciones del año. La ansiedad ha sido más prevalente que la depresión, posiblemente debido a las propias características de la muestra, con mayoría de pacientes con perfil disfuncional. (AU)

Background and objective: Fibromyalgia patients often report that certain seasons aggravate their symptoms. The main objective was to determinate the association between key symptoms of fibromyalgia and the season of the year. A secondary objective was to determinate the existence of differences based on levels of anxiety or depression.Material and methodConvenience sample made up of 471 participants with fibromyalgia evaluated before starting multidisciplinary treatment. Demographic and meteorological data were collected. Clinical data were assessed with standardized instruments of pain intensity, functionality, fatigue, stiffness, sleep quality, anxiety and depression.ResultsThe different groups of participants were homogeneous for age, gender, educational level, marital status and employment situation. No significant differences were found in pain intensity (F=1.334; P=.265), functionality (F=.402; P=.669), fatigue (F=.714; P=.490), stiffness (F=.299; P=.741), anxiety (F=.376; P=.687), depression (F=.608; P=.545), psychological distress (F=.261; P=.770), sleep quantity (F=1.507; P=.223) or sleep disturbances (F=.343; P=.710).ConclusionsNo differences were found in the intensity of fibromyalgia symptoms, nor in the percentages of severity among the different seasons of the year. Anxiety was more prevalent than depression, possibly due to the characteristics of the sample itself, with the majority of patients with a dysfunctional profile. (AU)

[Relationship between season of the year and severity of symptoms in patients with fibromyalgia]. / Relación entre la estación del año y la gravedad de los síntomas en pacientes con fibromialgia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Fibromyalgia patients often report that certain seasons aggravate their symptoms. The main objective was to determinate the association between key symptoms of fibromyalgia and the season of the year. A secondary objective was to determinate the existence of differences based on levels of anxiety or depression. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Convenience sample made up of 471 participants with fibromyalgia evaluated before starting multidisciplinary treatment. Demographic and meteorological data were collected. Clinical data were assessed with standardized instruments of pain intensity, functionality, fatigue, stiffness, sleep quality, anxiety and depression. RESULTS: The different groups of participants were homogeneous for age, gender, educational level, marital status and employment situation. No significant differences were found in pain intensity (F=1.334; P=.265), functionality (F=.402; P=.669), fatigue (F=.714; P=.490), stiffness (F=.299; P=.741), anxiety (F=.376; P=.687), depression (F=.608; P=.545), psychological distress (F=.261; P=.770), sleep quantity (F=1.507; P=.223) or sleep disturbances (F=.343; P=.710). CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found in the intensity of fibromyalgia symptoms, nor in the percentages of severity among the different seasons of the year. Anxiety was more prevalent than depression, possibly due to the characteristics of the sample itself, with the majority of patients with a dysfunctional profile.

Memory complaints and cognitive performance in fibromyalgia and chronic pain: The key role of depression.

To explore the relationship between perceived cognitive problems and cognitive performance in three different samples, taking into account the possible influence of depression, catastrophizing, pain intensity, or medication. Seventy individuals with fibromyalgia, 74 with non-malignant chronic pain and 40 pain-free controls, completed measures of verbal episodic memory, sustained attention, response inhibition, depression, catastrophizing, and pain intensity. Fibromyalgia and chronic pain patients performed worse than controls in verbal memory and sustained attention, but these differences disappeared when depressed participants were excluded from the analyses. Memory complaints were related with depression in all pain patients. However, in the case of fibromyalgia, memory complaints were also related by pain intensity and inversely related by short-term episodic memory. This case-control study shows the importance of jointly assessing cognitive performance and memory complaints and of controlling for variables such as depression, catastrophizing, pain intensity and medication in the studied samples. Accordingly, this study highlights the differences in memory complaints, between the patients with fibromyalgia and the patients with other chronic pain conditions. Finally, it has highlighted the important role played by depression in cognitive performance and memory complaints considering the Neurocognitive Model of Attention to pain.

Personal Construct Therapy vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in the Treatment of Depression in Women with Fibromyalgia: Study Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a debilitating syndrome, more prevalent in women, which is aggravated by the presence of depressive symptoms. In the last decade, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has demonstrated to reduce such depressive symptoms and pain in these patients, but there are still a considerable number of them who do not respond to interventions. The complexity of the disorder requires the consideration of the unique psychological characteristics of each patient to attain good outcomes. One approach that could accomplish this goal might be personal construct therapy (PCT), an idiographic approach that considers identity features and interpersonal meanings as their main target of intervention. Then, the aim of the study is to test the efficacy of PCT as compared to a well-established treatment in the reduction of depressive symptoms in women with fibromyalgia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial. In each condition participants will attend up to eighteen 1-hr weekly therapy sessions and up to three 1-hr booster sessions during the following 3-5 months after the end of treatment. The depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) will be the primary outcome measure and it will be assessed at baseline, at the end of therapy, and at 6-month follow-up. Other secondary measures will be applied following the same schedule. Participants will be 18- to 70-years-old women with a diagnosis of FM, presenting depressive symptoms evinced by scores above seven in depression items of the HADS-D. Intention-to-treat and complete case analyses will be performed for the main statistical tests. Linear mixed models will be used to analyze and to compare the treatment effects of both conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02711020.

Effects of a cognitive stimulation program on psychological well-being in a sample of elderly long-term care hospital inpatients.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this work is to report the observed changes in psychological well-being in a sample of long-term medically hospitalized patients, after attending a cognitive stimulation program. The secondary aim is to determine if the observed changes were related to previous cognitive level. METHODS: Inclusion criteria for study participation were to be a long-term care hospital inpatient, to be 65 years old or older, and to be cognitively preserved or with mild cognitive impairment. A total of 176 participants were included and distributed in two groups: Cognitive Stimulation Group (N = 123) and Non-Cognitive Stimulation Group (N = 53). Measures were applied just before the beginning of the program and just when it finished, two months later. Participants of the Non-Cognitive Stimulation Group were re-assessed again after two months. RESULTS: No differences were found between the two groups in the measures assessed at baseline. After treatment, participants of the Cognitive Stimulation Group improved significantly more in psychological well-being (p < .001) than the ones of the Non-Cognitive Stimulation Group. When unimpaired and mild cognitively impaired participants of the Cognitive Stimulation Group were studied separately, both groups improved their psychological well-being, but the unimpaired experienced a greater effect. CONCLUSION: Cognitive stimulation plays a role in the improvement of psychological well-being of elderly medically hospitalized patients unimpaired or with mild cognitive impairment. The improvements in psychological well-being were related to the previous cognitive status and to the number of sessions that had been attended.

Respuesta a: Fibromialgia y fatiga crónica causada por sensibilidad al gluten no celíaca / Response to: Fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome caused by non-celiac gluten sensitivity

No disponible

Body mass index and response to a multidisciplinary treatment of fibromyalgia.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there are some differences in the treatment responses to a multidisciplinary fibromyalgia (FM) treatment related with the baseline body mass index (BMI) of the participants. Inclusion criteria consisted of female sex, a diagnosis of FM (American College of Rheumatology criteria), age between 18 and 60 years, and between 3 and 8 years of schooling. Baseline BMI was determined, and patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment conditions: conventional pharmacologic treatment or multidisciplinary treatment. Outcome measures were pain intensity, functionality, catastrophizing, psychological distress, health-related quality of life, and sleep disturbances. One hundred thirty patients participated in the study. No statistical significant differences regarding pre-treatment outcomes were found among the different BMI subgroups, and between the two experimental conditions for each BMI category. General linear model analysis showed a significant interaction group treatment × time in pain intensity (p < .01), functionality (p < .0001), catastrophizing (p < .01), psychological distress (p < .0001), sleep index problems (p < .0001), and health-related quality of life (p < .05). No significant interactions were found in BMI × time, and in BMI × group treatment × time. There are not differences among normal weight, overweight and obese patients with FM regarding their response to a multidisciplinary treatment programme for FM which combines pharmacological treatment, education, physical therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy.

Single high-dose vs. fractionated radiotherapy: Effects on plant growth rates.

AIM: To evaluate the differential effects of fractionated vs. high-dose radiotherapy on plant growth. BACKGROUND: Interest in hypofractionated radiotherapy has increased substantially in recent years as tumours (especially of the lung, prostate, and liver) can be irradiated with ever greater accuracy due to technological improvements. The effects of low-dose ionizing radiation on plant growth have been studied extensively, yet few studies have investigated the effect of high-dose, hypofractionated radiotherapy on plant growth development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 150 plants from the genus Capsicum annuum were randomized to receive fractionated radiotherapy (5 doses of 10 Gy each), single high-dose (SHD) radiotherapy (single 50 Gy dose), or no radiotherapy (control group). Irradiation was delivered via linear accelerator and all samples were followed daily for 26 days to assess and compare daily growth. RESULTS: On day 26, plants in the control, fractionated, and SHD groups had grown to a mean height of 7.55 cm, 4.32 cm, and 2.94 cm, respectively. These differences in overall growth were highly significant (P = 0.005). The SHD group showed the least amount of growth. CONCLUSIONS: SHD effectively stunts plant growth and development. Despite the evident differences between plant and animal cells, ionizing radiation is believed to work in a similar manner in all biological cells. These findings highlight the need to continue investigating the use of hypofractionated schemes in humans to improve cancer treatment outcomes.

Efficacy of a multidisciplinary fibromyalgia treatment adapted for women with low educational levels: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Multidisciplinary treatments of fibromyalgia (FM) have demonstrated efficacy. Nevertheless, they have been criticized for not maintaining their benefits and for not being studied for specific populations. Our objectives were to determine the efficacy of a multidisciplinary treatment for FM adapted for patients with low educational levels and to determine the maintenance of its therapeutic benefits during a long-term followup period. METHODS: Inclusion criteria consisted of female sex, a diagnosis of FM (using American College of Rheumatology criteria), age between 18 and 60 years, and between 3 and 8 years of schooling. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 treatment conditions: conventional pharmacologic treatment or multidisciplinary treatment. Outcome measures were functionality, sleep disturbances, pain intensity, catastrophizing, and psychological distress. Analysis was by intent-to-treat and missing data were replaced following the baseline observation carried forward method. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-five participants were recruited. No statistically significant differences regarding pretreatment measures were found between the 2 experimental groups. Overall statistics comparison showed a significant difference between the 2 groups in all of the variables studied (P < 0.0001). Mixed linear model analysis demonstrated the superiority of the multidisciplinary treatment in all of the studied variables at posttreatment. The differences were maintained at 12-month followup in sleep disturbances (P < 0.0001), catastrophizing (P < 0.0001), and psychological distress (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary treatment adapted for individuals with low educational levels is effective in reducing key symptoms of FM. Some improvements were maintained 1 year after completing the multidisciplinary treatment.

Multicomponent cognitive-behavioral group therapy with hypnosis for the treatment of fibromyalgia: long-term outcome.

UNLABELLED: This study compared the efficacy of 2 psychological treatments for fibromyalgia with each other and with standard care. Ninety-three patients with fibromyalgia (FM) were randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 experimental conditions: 1) multicomponent cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT); 2) multicomponent CBT with hypnosis; and 3) pharmacological treatment (standard care control group). The outcome measures of pain intensity, catastrophizing, psychological distress, functionality, and sleep disturbances were assessed before treatment, immediately after treatment, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up visits. CBT and CBT with hypnosis participants received the standard pharmacological management plus 14 weekly, 120-minute-long sessions of psychological treatment. All but 1 session followed a group format; the remaining session was individual. The analyses indicated that: 1) patients with FM who received multicomponent CBT alone or multicomponent CBT with hypnosis showed greater improvements than patients who received only standard care; and 2) adding hypnosis enhanced the effectiveness of multicomponent CBT. This study presents new evidence about the efficacy of multicomponent CBT for FM and about the additional effects of hypnosis as a complement to CBT. The relevance and implications of the obtained results are discussed. PERSPECTIVE: This article highlights the beneficial effects of adding hypnosis in a multicomponent cognitive-behavioral group treatment of fibromyalgia patients. Also, this research showed that by adding hypnosis the length of treatment did not increase.

Effect of hypnotic suggestion on fibromyalgic pain: comparison between hypnosis and relaxation.

The main aims of this experimental study are: (1) to compare the relative effects of analgesia suggestions and relaxation suggestions on clinical pain, and (2) to compare the relative effect of relaxation suggestions when they are presented as "hypnosis" and as "relaxation training". Forty-five patients with fibromyalgia were randomly assigned to one of the following experimental conditions: (a) hypnosis with relaxation suggestions; (b) hypnosis with analgesia suggestions; (c) relaxation. Before and after the experimental session, the pain intensity was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the sensory and affective dimensions were measured with the McGill Pain Questionnaire. The results showed: (1) that hypnosis followed by analgesia suggestions has a greater effect on the intensity of pain and on the sensory dimension of pain than hypnosis followed by relaxation suggestions; (2) that the effect of hypnosis followed by relaxation suggestions is not greater than relaxation. We discuss the implications of the study on our understanding of the importance of suggestions used in hypnosis and of the differences and similarities between hypnotic relaxation and relaxation training.